LandlordEzy
Case Study

Eviction Order for Substantial Interference - Endless Property Holdings v Parkinson

Analysis of Tenant's Interference and Legal Consequences

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: October 5, 2023

Order Issued: November 16, 2023

Termination Date: October 21, 2022

Eviction Deadline: Date not provided

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-062207-22
Address: 105, 1284 GRAMERCY PARK PL, LONDON ON N5W2E6
Form Used: N5 Notice to End your Tenancy for Interfering with Others, Damage or Overcrowding
Served By: Placing under the door or through mail slot
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment or lawful rights
RTA Sections: Section 64(1), Section 64(3), Section 68, Section 83(1)(a), Section 83(2), Section 204(1)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Endless Property Holdings
Landlord Rep: Brittany Stewart
Tenant: Patricia Parkinson
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Not provided
Keywords: eviction, substantial interference, reasonable enjoyment, lawful rights, N5 notice, video evidence, tenant behavior, relief from eviction

⚖️ Decision summary

Tenant's actions constituted substantial interference; eviction justified.
Relief from eviction granted under conditions to prevent future interference.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Dispute centers on tenant's interference with landlord's ability to maintain property.
Tenant accused of threatening behavior and blocking entry for necessary maintenance.

📑 Findings & determinations

First N5 notice voided due to lack of further evidence of misconduct within specified period.
Second N5 notice valid, leading to eviction order based on substantial interference.

💡 Summary points

Tenant substantially interfered with landlord's rights by preventing pest control access.
Landlord served two N5 notices; the second led to eviction proceedings.
Tenant's disruptive actions included threats and preventing entry.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

🏷️ Related by keywords

eviction substantial interference reasonable enjoyment lawful rights N5 notice video evidence tenant behavior relief from eviction

Eviction Order for Non-payment of Rent

2803, 240 Wellesley St E, Toronto

Matched Keyword

LTB Order for Eviction and Payment of Rent Arrears

Case LTB-L-071895-22 Decision

Matched Keyword

Eviction Order for Non-Compliance with Termination Agreement

LTB Order Review: Montesano v Lolic

Matched Keyword

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not provided

Eviction Order for Non-payment of Rent

Case LTB-L-024250-22

Same Adjudicator

LTB Order on Non-payment of Rent - Case LTB-L-029871-22

Eviction and Financial Determinations for Non-payment

Same Adjudicator

Eviction Order Upheld for Tenant's Failure to Adhere to Agreement

Case LTB-L-064784-22

Same Adjudicator

📂 Related by application type

Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment or lawful rights

Eviction Order for Carson Migwans by Greater Sudbury Housing Corporation

Substantial Interference with Enjoyment Leads to Eviction

Same Application Type

Eviction Order for Substantial Interference - Minto Apartment Limited Partnership v Delage

LTB Order Highlights Tenant Eviction for Repeated Disturbances

Same Application Type

Eviction Order for Substantial Interference - Siddiqui v Adel

LTB Order Analysis and Summary

Same Application Type