Report Rent to Equifax — Submit your monthly rent report by the 25th · 11:59 PM ET. Time left: --d · --h · --m · --s

All Ezy Case Studies

Explore AI-powered summaries of LTB orders and legal outcomes

Advanced Filter

6 Case Studies Available

📁 Case: LTB-L-052766-22, LTB-L-036643-23

Tenant: Steven Garbe

Address: 107, 1148 AFTON DR, SARNIA ON N7S5B7

Adjudicator: Not specified

Amount Awarded: Compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary

📁 Case: LTB-L-041582-22

Tenant: Zofia Muczynska

Address: 708, 21 Vaughan Rd, Toronto ON M6G2N2

Adjudicator: Not specified

Amount Awarded: $186.00 for application costs, daily compensation of $40.68

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary

📁 Case: LTB-L-068368-22

Tenant: Brittany Clark, Kris a.k.a. K Daniel Grigsby

Address: 234 CONCESSION 10 TOWNSEND ROAD WATERFORD ON N0E1Y0

Adjudicator: Not specified

Amount Awarded: Not specified

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary

📁 Case: LTB-L-041564-22

Tenant: Rob Kinnear

Address: 9, 62 CAWSTON ST, STRATFORD ON N5A5N2

Adjudicator: Not specified

Amount Awarded: Compensation for each day tenant remained after termination date

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary

📁 Case: LTB-L-070659-22

Tenant: Kim aka Kimberly Samuel

Address: Main Floor-151 Dooley Crescent, Ajax, ON L1T 4J6

Adjudicator: Not specified

Amount Awarded: $7,803.62

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary

📁 Case: LTB-L-074561-22

Tenant: Kody Sippel

Address: UPPER UNIT2, 2150 ADJALA-TECUMSETH TOWNLINE, TOTTENHAM ON L0G1W0

Adjudicator: Sandra Macchione

Amount Awarded: Not specified

Application: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and lawful rights

View Case Summary