LandlordEzy
Case Study

LTB Case Analysis: Lokuwaduge v Wang

Exploring Maintenance and Enjoyment Interference Claims

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: August 9, 2021

Order Issued: November 23, 2023

Termination Date: January 12, 2020

Eviction Deadline: February 23, 2020

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-077044-22(SWT-39457-19)
Address: 538 Lilith Street, Ottawa Ontario K2J6M1
Form Used: N11 Agreement to End the Tenancy
Served By: Landlord's legal counsel
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Not specified
Application Type: Maintenance obligations failure and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, Reasonable enjoyment provisions under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Demin Wang
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Saman Kumara Alwis Lokuwaduge
Tenant Rep: Charindu Lokuwaduge
Adjudicator: Not specified
Keywords: maintenance obligations, reasonable enjoyment, flood damage, repair delays, rent abatement

⚖️ Decision summary

The decision on whether the landlord or tenant's claims prevail is not detailed in the provided text.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Dispute centers on landlord's response to flood damage and its impact on tenant's living conditions.
Tenant sought compensation for out-of-pocket expenses and rent abatement.

📑 Findings & determinations

Both applications (T2 and T6) are based on the same facts with identical remedies requested.
Evidence supports a maintenance and repair issue in the rental unit.

💡 Summary points

Tenant alleges landlord failed to promptly repair flood damages.
Tenant claims substantial interference with enjoyment due to repair delays.
Landlord offered alternative housing which was unsuitable for tenant's needs.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified