LandlordEzy
Case Study

Eviction Order for Substantial Interference - LTB-L-066833-22

Promar Investments vs. Justine Schramek

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: February 6, 2023

Order Issued: February 14, 2023

Termination Date: February 25, 2023

Eviction Deadline: February 25, 2023

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-066833-22
Address: 302, 233 Durand St, Sarnia ON N7T5A5
Form Used: N5
Served By: Landlord
Amount Awarded: $3,623.29
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 68, Section 106(10), Section 83(2), Section 83(1)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Promar Investments c/o Elite Property Group (2018) Inc.
Landlord Rep: Melissa Anjema
Tenant: Justine Schramek
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Richard Ferriss
Keywords: eviction, substantial interference, reasonable enjoyment, compensation, daily compensation, N5 notice

⚖️ Decision summary

Tenancy terminated effective February 25, 2023.
Tenant must pay $3,623.29 in compensation and $186.00 for application costs.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenant involved in physical altercation and disruptive behavior.
Landlord issued two N5 notices for termination.

📑 Findings & determinations

Tenancy terminated due to proven substantial interference.
Compensation for use and occupation awarded to landlord.

💡 Summary points

Tenant substantially interfered with landlord's and other tenants' enjoyment.
Tenant failed to appear at the hearing.
Landlord awarded compensation for overdue rent and costs.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Richard Ferriss