LandlordEzy
Case Study

LTB Order Review: Sidhu v Adam

Case Analysis and Outcome

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: February 15, 2023

Order Issued: May 12, 2023

Termination Date: March 31, 2023

Eviction Deadline: March 31, 2023

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-001040-23-SA
Address: 58 Washburn Road East, Brampton Ontario L6P3V6
Form Used: N11
Served By: Landlord
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Eviction for non-payment of rent
RTA Sections: Section 77(8)(b), Section 202

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Gurmail Sidhu
Landlord Rep: Karen Byfield
Tenant: Abdullahi Adam
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Jana Rozehnal
Keywords: eviction, non-payment of rent, N11 agreement, set aside

⚖️ Decision summary

The board found the eviction process was circumvented by the N11 agreement.
It was determined setting aside the eviction order was fair.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Landlord filed for eviction citing a signed N11 agreement.
Tenant contested, claiming the agreement was signed under financial pressure.

📑 Findings & determinations

The N11 agreement was signed under circumstances not aligning with the RTA's due process.
The eviction order was set aside, allowing the tenant to remain.

💡 Summary points

Tenant signed an N11 agreement under financial duress.
Order to evict tenant was initially issued without a hearing.
Motion to set aside the eviction order was granted.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Jana Rozehnal

📂 Related by application type

Eviction for non-payment of rent