LandlordEzy
Case Study

LTB Order Dismissal for Defective N5 Notice

Case LTB-L-026773-22

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: March 29, 2023

Order Issued: July 25, 2023

Termination Date: May 24, 2022

Eviction Deadline: Date not provided

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-026773-22
Address: basement apartment, 16 Jones Court, Aurora ON L4G2B8
Form Used: Second N5 Notice
Served By: personally to Melanie Amber Moon
Amount Awarded: None
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Eviction for substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Tatiana Brudny
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Melanie Amber Moon, Robert Lamontagne
Tenant Rep: Sharon Crowe
Adjudicator: Terri van Huisstede
Keywords: eviction, substantial interference, reasonable enjoyment, N5 notice, defective notice

⚖️ Decision summary

Application dismissed due to insufficient detail in the notice of termination.
Notice failed to meet requirements set by Divisional Court in Ball v. Metro Capital Property.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Landlord sought eviction citing substantial interference.
Tenants contested the clarity and validity of the N5 notice.

📑 Findings & determinations

First N5 Notice found confusing and onerous.
Second N5 Notice failed to correct the deficiencies of the first notice.

💡 Summary points

Landlord's eviction application dismissed due to defective notice.
Second N5 Notice deemed invalid as it did not provide clear allegations.
Landlord failed to correct deficiencies with substantial evidence.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Terri van Huisstede