LandlordEzy
Case Study

LTB Order Review: DeMenna v Ghosh

Analysis of Tenant's Complaints and Landlord's Responses

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: 2023-07-13

Order Issued: 2023-07-27

Termination Date: Not applicable

Eviction Deadline: Not applicable

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-041357-22
Address: Basement, 75 Pepperwood Cres, Kitchener, Ontario N2A2R4
Form Used: Not specified
Served By: Not specified
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Interference with reasonable enjoyment and withholding vital services
RTA Sections: Section 21(1), Section 22

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Subhadip Ghosh
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Valerie DeMenna, Natalie Labine
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Not specified
Keywords: reasonable enjoyment, vital services, hot water, electrical outlets, draft, flood

⚖️ Decision summary

Application dismissed as the landlord addressed all issues within reasonable limits.
No evidence of deliberate withholding of services or substantial interference.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenants complained about lack of hot water, draft, and electrical issues.
Landlord responded to issues, but tenants were unsatisfied with the timeliness or effectiveness in some cases.

📑 Findings & determinations

No substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment found.
Landlord did not withhold vital services deliberately.

💡 Summary points

Tenants alleged landlord withheld vital services and interfered with reasonable enjoyment.
Issues included lack of hot water, non-functional electrical outlets, draft above stove, and a flood.
Landlord addressed the issues within reasonable timeframes; no substantial interference found.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified