LandlordEzy
Case Study

Determination of Bad Faith in Notice of Termination

LTB Case LTB-T-067886-22 Analysis

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: September 11, 2023

Order Issued: October 4, 2023

Termination Date: July 31, 2021

Eviction Deadline: July 31, 2021

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-067886-22
Address: 1011, 4770 TUCANA COURT, MISSISSAUGA ONTARIO L5R3K8
Form Used: N12
Served By: Ravi Kana (aka Ravi Kanagaratnam)
Amount Awarded: $1,376.63 (Rent Differential: $1,304.04, Moving Expenses: $72.59)
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Determination of bad faith in notice of termination
RTA Sections: 57(3), 57(5), 57(6)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Alex Wiredu-Asante, Priscilla Wiredu-Asante
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Lakshman Pushparajan, Pushparajan Sinnadurai, Kalanithy Pushparajan, Ushica Nisanth
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Not provided
Keywords: bad faith, N12 notice, termination, rent differential, moving expenses

⚖️ Decision summary

Landlords delivered N12 notice in bad faith.
Tenants awarded rent differential and moving expenses.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenants allege Landlords issued N12 in bad faith.
Evidence suggests Landlords planned to sell rather than occupy.

📑 Findings & determinations

Landlords failed to prove genuine intent to occupy.
Presumption of bad faith established under RTA ss. 57(5).

💡 Summary points

Tenants vacated due to an N12 notice.
Landlords did not occupy the unit as stated in the notice.
Landlords listed the unit for sale shortly after tenants vacated.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not provided

📂 Related by application type

Determination of bad faith in notice of termination