Case Study

LTB Order Review - Substantial Interference Case Dismissal

Case LTB-T-073915-22 - Noise and Renovation Dispute

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: 2022-11-10, 2022-11-25, 2023-01-20

Order Issued: 2023-10-11

Termination Date: Not applicable

Eviction Deadline: Not applicable

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-073915-22

Address: 104, 34 NOBLE STREET, TORONTO ON M6K2C9

Form Used: Not applicable

Served By: Not applicable

Amount Awarded: None

Decision In Favor: Landlord

Application Type: Substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment

RTA Sections: Section 8 of O Reg 516/06, Section 22, paragraph 3 of subsection 29 (1) and subsection 31 (1) of the Act

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: NJS CAPITAL

Landlord Rep: B. Rubin, M. Teich

Tenant: SHAN SHAN (CINDY) LI, ERIC DAVIS

Tenant Rep: Self Represented

Adjudicator: Not specified

Keywords: substantial interference, reasonable enjoyment, renovation noise, dismissed

⚖️ Decision summary

Board ruled in favor of the landlord, dismissing the tenants' claims.
Impact of renovations considered not substantial enough to warrant action.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenants complained about noise and disruptions from renovations above their unit.
Landlord argued renovations were necessary and noise was typical for construction.

📑 Findings & determinations

No substantial interference found on a balance of probabilities.
Work carried out was not unreasonable under the circumstances.

💡 Summary points

Tenants alleged substantial interference due to renovations.
Application dismissed as interference was not found unreasonable.
Renovations included updates to meet modern standards.

📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

🏷️ Related by keywords

substantial interference reasonable enjoyment renovation noise dismissed

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified