Case Timeline
Application Date: Date not provided
Hearing Date: July 14, 2022
Order Issued: February 6, 2023
Termination Date: Not applicable
Eviction Deadline: Not applicable
Case Overview
Case Number: LTB-T-074699-22-RV3
Address: 102, 10 Eddystone Avenue, North York Ontario M3N2T2
Form Used: Not applicable
Served By: Not applicable
Amount Awarded: Not applicable
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Review of prior order regarding illegal entry and other violations
RTA Sections:
Parties Involved
Landlord: Geeta Khan, Patrick Khan
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Abdulkadir Kiar
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Harry Cho
Keywords: illegal entry, harassment, review order, locking system
Decision Summary
Review request by landlords denied.
Previous order confirmed and remains unchanged.
Dispute Summary
Dispute over illegal entry, harassment, and locking system alterations.
Multiple reviews of initial order requested by both tenant and landlords.
Findings & Determinations
No serious error in previous order.
Landlords not unable to participate in prior proceedings.
Landlords' latest review request denied.
Summary Points
Tenant accused landlords of illegal entry and harassment.
Initial order resolved, subsequent reviews requested by both parties.
Final review confirms no serious error in previous proceedings.
View Official PDF
Eviction Order Review Denied for Non-Payment of Rent
Review of LTB Order LTB-L-019588-22
Matched Keyword
LTB Order on Eviction for Non-Payment of Rent
Review Order Confirmation and Tenant's Responsibilities
Matched Keyword
LTB Order Review Decision for Batkhuu Regsuren vs Robert Ulises Pagliero
Confirmation of Eviction Order Following Tenant's Review Request
Matched Keyword
Same Adjudicator
Harry Cho
Eviction Order for Damage and Interference Confirmed on Review
Review Order Case LTB-L-010585-22-RV
Same Adjudicator
Eviction Order Confirmation for Landlord's Personal Use
Review Order Denied
Same Adjudicator
LTB Order Review Decision - Jones v Morris
Review of harassment and interference claims denied
Same Adjudicator
