Eviction Order for Claude Rolland vs Mile Peric

The adjudicator upheld the original eviction order.
Tenant was given until January 31, 2023, to vacate the unit.

Tenant contested the eviction after agreeing to terminate the tenancy.
Tenant claimed inability to find new housing and requested to stay until end of June.
Landlord reported significant rental arrears and financial distress due to non-payment.

Agreement to terminate tenancy was valid and signed by the tenant.
Tenant's request to set aside the eviction order was denied.
Eviction order remains effective with a stay lifted on January 31, 2023.

Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy.
Landlord applied for eviction based on non-payment and agreement to terminate.
Motion to set aside the eviction order was denied.